Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 2:18pm |
Quote: Originally posted by Mark Peterson on 19 March 2003
It is my understanding that soon after fish waste hits the water it chemically converts to ammonia/ammonium. In the presense of oxygen, billions of bacteria in the water and on surfaces like glass and rock exposed to oxygenated water consume the ammonia/ammonium as food, converting it to nitrate. Here are chemical equations for:
NITRIFICATION (Ammonia & Nitrite to Nitrate) (???)
NH4+ + 2O2 ® NO3 + H2O +2H+
DENITRIFICATION: (Nitrate to gas & water)
5C6H12O6 + 24NO3- + 24H+ ® 30CO2 + 12N2 + 42H2O
This info is courtesy of CaribSea. They published an extensive reference sheet years ago that I have recently converted to an electronic file in MS Word format. It is very informative about a number of topics. If interested, email your request and I will reply with the draft copy.
You may notice that contrary to being a reverse process as was suggested in one of the posts above, bacteria in a low oxygen environment consume sugar and nitrate to obtain energy and the waste is carbon dioxide, nitrogen and water.
The reason why I prefer to use a protein skimmer is to remove the organics before they have a chance to decompose to NH3/NH4+.
I should be more careful how I explain things (in regards to the reaction being reversed). I come from a chemistry (engineering) background and yes the nitrogen cycle (as far as the nitrogen molecule is concerned) is going back and forth in an oxydation/reduction reaction.
Ammonia --> Nitrate (oxydation)
Nitrate --> Nitrogen/Ammonia (reduction)
The same "type" of reactions also take place in an aquarium with regard to sulfur.
Decaying biomatter --> H2S --> S04 (oxydation)
S04 --> H2S (reduction)
|
|
|
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 2:20pm |
Quote: Originally posted by Jake Pehrson on 19 March 2003
Also it is my opinion that macro algae reproducing sexually in the aquarium is good and not bad. How many people have had a problem with macro algae sprouting up out of nowhere and tanking over your tank?
Doesn't the decaying algae cause an ammonia spike?
|
|
|
rfoote
Guest
Joined: February 24 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1926
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 2:27pm |
Mark - ispf.com - I wouldn't mind going in with you. This is something I want to do, I'm just not ready for it yet. Might be a month or two. Trying to decide if I want to add a refugium to my system.
|
|
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 2:36pm |
Quote: Originally posted by Adam Blundell on 19 March 2003
And, did anyone else notice in Mark's equation the 24H+
That is pretty darn acidic to have happen in an aquarium. Hence a main reason many people don't worry about denitrification, and the ability to convert NO3 in reef aquariums. Once you can handle that part of the equation, then try dealing with the dillema of "where do the sugars come from?"
Adam
Well, if the nitrificaiton and denitrification are happening near enough to each other (in the live rock or DSB), then the H+ produced from the nitrification process are consumed in the denitrification process with no net increase/decrease in H+. As to where the carbs come from, I've always assumed they were in the water column...it's the same source of carbs that the nitrification bacteria used.
|
|
|
Mark Peterson
Paid Member
Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 2:57pm |
Rick Greenfield, owner of CaribSea and a Ph.D Scientist of some sort himself, always used to talk of the acidic condition within the substrate which contributed to the dissolving of his product. This process is what made using his product so beneficial because it released calcium and the other minerals from the aragonite into the water for use as buffer and coral builing material. Nobody could refute his claim because we didn't know enough about it ourselves! He claimed that eventually a person would have to add more substrate to replace that which dissolved.
Jon, Why would decaying algae create an ammonia spike? I always thought of it as leading to an increase of organic material bonded to phosphate, carbon and perhaps nitrates too. I'm in the dark here. Help!
|
|
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 3:14pm |
Quote: Originally posted by Mark Peterson on 19 March 2003
Rick Greenfield, owner of CaribSea and a Ph.D Scientist of some sort himself, always used to talk of the acidic condition within the substrate which contributed to the dissolving of his product. This process is what made using his product so beneficial because it released calcium and the other minerals from the aragonite into the water for use as buffer and coral builing material. Nobody could refute his claim because we didn't know enough about it ourselves! He claimed that eventually a person would have to add more substrate to replace that which dissolved.
Jon, Why would decaying algae create an ammonia spike? I always thought of it as leading to an increase of organic material bonded to phosphate, carbon and perhaps nitrates too. I'm in the dark here. Help!
I've heard that about dissolving CaCO3 too, but I've never heard of anyone actually having to add more substrate, have you? If it were true, there would not be any H+ left for denitrification (back to adams statement). The H+ is made in the nitrification process.
Re: decaying plants; Just what I've heard, not experienced. Wouldn't the amino acids (nucleaic acids) in the algae decompose to NH3?
|
|
|
Mark Peterson
Paid Member
Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 3:32pm |
I assumed Rick was speaking of a long term process that no hobbyist would ever notice.
Amino Acids? I would like to know how it all works and fits together so that we can be sure we are making use of the best filtration methods or to come up with better.
I agree that a skimmer takes out the organics before bacteria can get to them. SPS coral does best with good skimming. So what does that say about the use of biological filtration without skimming and its effect on SPS?
|
|
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 4:38pm |
Quote: Originally posted by Mark Peterson on 19 March 2003
I assumed Rick was speaking of a long term process that no hobbyist would ever notice.
Amino Acids? I would like to know how it all works and fits together so that we can be sure we are making use of the best filtration methods or to come up with better.
I agree that a skimmer takes out the organics before bacteria can get to them. SPS coral does best with good skimming. So what does that say about the use of biological filtration without skimming and its effect on SPS?
All plant and animal life has proteins in the mix (nitrogen is found in DNA, ATP, complex proteins).
I'm not sure what you're getting at regarding SPS w/o skimmer. I'm really not sure why SPS corals do better with good skimming. They used to be a very difficult coral to keep, but now they're almost run of the mill. Maybe SPS success has more to do with low nitrates then anything else?
How long has Bird World's display tank been operated using the Biolife (or whatever it's called) refugium system? I'd call that a successful SPS/mixed tank without any skimming.
|
|
|
sjlopez39
Guest
Joined: January 18 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 479
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 19 2003 at 10:23pm |
Jkelson and mrkelson- I actually didn't suggest that you add more bio wheels. I think the ones you have are plenty and mabe too much according to jfinches point in regards to bio wheels accumulating nitrates.
The message I was trying to relay is that the use of power heads as a means of water circulation in your tank would be a good idea. I suggested this because you had asked if the filter with the bio wheels would create enough water movement.
|
Keep your hands and arms inside the tank and enjoy the ride!
Steve
|
|