Utah Reefs Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Appropriate nitrate levels for different corals.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Appropriate nitrate levels for different corals.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Chris Scott View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Foothill, SLC
Status: Offline
Points: 334
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chris Scott Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2010 at 11:26am
Originally posted by Mark Peterson Mark Peterson wrote:

 

My guess, just from the pics is that the sand is being disturbed too often. Sounds like you are more concerned about black sand than you need to be. Dirty sand is actually healthy sand enabling good biofiltration.

 

What would you say would be a good schedule to vacuum a dsb?  never?  I have heard conflicting stories on whether to vacuum a sandbed.  If I am trying to have a dsb, should I vacuum just the top and not go too deep, or just let my nassurius snails (and I plan to get a cucumber) move it around a bit?

Thanks,
Chris
55g Bowfront Corner Reef
Back to Top
Mark Peterson View Drop Down
Paid Member
Paid Member
Avatar

Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mark Peterson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2010 at 12:25pm
Okay, so what about my suggestion to check the Nitrate level of the water in the Refugium? I'm assuming you took water from the display for the tests. If I'm right, then more flow through the Refugium will drop the Nitrates in the display.

Caulerpa also needs Phosphate and Iron. Have you been using PO4 removal media?

You might be surprised what a little extra sandbed will do. I often recommend that a few quarts of Oolitic sand be placed underneath a courser particle sandbed. It reduces N and eliminates Cyano.

Conflicting stories? It's very important to take into account the length and amount of experience of any person making recommendations.)

Yes, the last line. I only recommend vacuuming the deeper sandbed when nothing at all has been done with it for 4+ years. What I have found best for a sand bed is to periodically stir portions of it by hand or with a stick. A Turkey baster or Syringe with a straw can be used to push water into the sand bed to make a puff of detritus. Coral and other inverts love it, because that is food for them. `

When I worked for a maintenance company, I soon recognized that vacuuming is what guarantees their job. The regular vacuuming of a sandbed removes and disturbs the flora and fauna, the life in the LS. It creates the need for regular vacuuming to remove detritus and clean up the algae that grows on the sand because there is no decent life there.

Hope that helps bring up a few more questions.Wink


Edited by Mark Peterson - July 01 2010 at 12:37pm
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:
www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244
Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member
Back to Top
Jake Pehrson View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2002
Location: Murray, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 4279
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jake Pehrson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2010 at 12:48pm
First off I would like to admit that I just skimmed through the above posts.  Here are a couple of my opinions.

*Bubbles in a sand bed do not necessarily translate to denitrification, the best indicator of good nitrification is low nitrates.
*I think it is a good thing to vacuum your sand bed at least every once in a while (a few times a year).  I usually don't vacuum the entire bed, usually I only do a partial area. I also only vacuum the very top layer.   Vacuuming the sand bed too often can be detrimental instead of helpful.
*
Jake Pehrson

Murray

coralplanet.com

:)
Back to Top
Chris Scott View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Foothill, SLC
Status: Offline
Points: 334
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chris Scott Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2010 at 1:27pm
Originally posted by Mark Peterson Mark Peterson wrote:

 

Conflicting stories? It's very important to take into account the length and amount of experience of any person making recommendations.)



Thats a good clarification, I should have said I've had conflicting recommendations from different people. Smile

I now get my recommendations right here.

Thanks,
Chris
55g Bowfront Corner Reef
Back to Top
fishoutawater View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Avatar

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Herriman
Status: Offline
Points: 639
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fishoutawater Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 01 2010 at 9:57pm
I do not use a phosphate remover, but it doesn't register on the test kits. since I have algae growing I assume that I do in fact have some in the water.
 
Testing from the water exiting the fuge shows no significant change, running over 20x/hr the sump volume through it that doesn't surprise me.
 
Changes to date over the last 3 months:
     Started running a filter sock
     Cut feedings in half or even less for the last week
     Added 4 hours of light in the fuge, now at 16 hrs.
     Stopped basting the sand around the edge of the tank for the last week.
What other suggestions would any of you make? Here is what I am contemplating:
     Adding a couple inches of sand to fuge.
     24/7 lighting in fuge
     Building a coil denitrator
Question not answered in my last post,- should I cut back all of the macro that is decaying along with any that has cyano growing on it?
 
I know every tank is a little different, If I add sand that will take several weeks/months? to mature and start working, what about the other changes? Would you guys do one at a time and give it a month or so to see what affect it has? Or do it all at once?
Some day, when I grow up,...

Back to Top
Mark Peterson View Drop Down
Paid Member
Paid Member
Avatar

Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mark Peterson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2010 at 9:58am
Darn, I was hoping for a different number from the Refugium water. Okay that points the resolution in another direction. Let's look at tweaking something that will influence the entire system.

Good changes so far. I always run the RDP lights overlapping the main lights by a few hours. 24/7 lighting is not necessary here and because the algae is not growing well anyway, I don't believe it will help at this point.

I was being a bit dramatic regarding my no vacuuming comments. I've had too many occasions talking to hobbyists telling me about their really dirty tank and how they vacuumed it often to keep it clean. Of course this only compounds the problem, requiring more and more vacuuming.Embarrassed

Yes, from my experience I would definitely remove the dieing algae. It's just putting unwanted stuff back into the water. I suspect that algae harvesting has not been part of the regimen in this system, right? Because it was not growing. And yet the test shows higher levels of Nitrate. This is the red flag and probably the reason for this thread. Smile Have you considered using some Chaetomorpha or other Macroalgae along with the Caulerpa? Different Alga can process N at different rates.

If the PO4 test shows nil, that could be a reason for dieing algae and higher N. The lack of Phosphate leaves the algae starved and it cannot grow, thus N stays in the system longer before being processed by the other parts of the biofiltration. The addition of foods containing more PO4 or a chemical form of PO4 could do the job. There are fertilizers meant for Macroalgae. The "f4" fertilizer used to grow phyto could also be used. I've even used Miracle Grow fertilizer. Algae needs iron to grow.

Coil denitrators work extremely slow. I wouldn't waste my time on this one.

Clean sand will start to populate immediately and it's effect will show as early as one week. Oolitic sand is especially useful since it requires less sand to do the job. If this were my tank, I would do two things first:

1. Add Oolitic sand to the tank, placed under the existing sand. (Make several depressions down to the glass, slowly pour Oolitic into the depression and cover it over with the old sand.) Since most Nitrates are processed in the deepest area of the sandbed (also in the deepest part of LR) this action goes straight to the need, to reduce Nitrates.

2. Add another type of Macroalgae. This will help the Refugium. Caulerpa is so prone to go sexual anyway, that the additional variety of algae not only seems to inhibit the sexual dissolving of Caulerpa but it adds to the N processing ability of the Refugium in general.

3. I would consider a tiny amount of PO4 and Fe rich fertilizer and watch for an immediate spurt in growth.

Adding a sandbed to the Refugium is optional at this point and if it were me I would hold off just to see what difference items 1, 2 and 3 make. Smile
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:
www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244
Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.297 seconds.