<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>WMAS Discussion Forum : wet dry</title>
  <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; WMAS Discussion Forum : Equipment : wet dry]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.03</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.utahreefs.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=169</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Comments and arguments for Mark. Thank...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=841&amp;title=wet-dry#841</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Jake Pehrson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January&nbsp;11&nbsp;2003 at 8:45pm<br /><br /><P>Comments and arguments for Mark.</P><P>Thank you for you post.&nbsp; You have helped to clarify my original post about deep sand beds.&nbsp; For the most part I would agree with your post.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=841&amp;title=wet-dry#841</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : A skimmer and RDP sump are excellent...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=805&amp;title=wet-dry#805</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=4">Mark Peterson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January&nbsp;06&nbsp;2003 at 7:07pm<br /><br /><P>A skimmer and RDP sump are excellent supplements to the sand and rock but not necessary.</P><P>Assuming that you have regular sized arag&#111;nite for the sand, if you added 2 more inches of that arag&#111;nite you would then have a place for denitrificati&#111;n which is occurring &#111;nly in the rock at present. When denitrificati&#111;n is occurring in the rock &#111;nly, the nitrates will tend to build up and run at higher levels which irritates the coral. Any&nbsp;increase of dead organic matter could lead to a quick&nbsp;bloom of algae. Water changes become very important in this situati&#111;n.</P><P>As I said in previous posts, using about an inch or less of Oolitic can take the place of at least 2 inches of regular arag&#111;nite. It can be added a little at a time so that it sifts down through the arag&#111;nite. The external filter is needed at this time but as the sand bed increases in depth/surface area&nbsp;the external filter&nbsp;will be less important but still good as an extra. Mostly because of&nbsp;water&nbsp;circulati&#111;n and aerati&#111;n as it drops back into the tank. Water changes are also less important as the nitrates are better handled.</P><P>The organisms you currently have look good. After increasing the sand bed depth, add a&nbsp;little macroalgae and you could keep 4 or 5 fish a lot more coral and even a shrimp! Make sure you balance the fishes according to food requirements (meat eaters vs algae eaters).</P><P>Larger particles allow detritus to fall down between the particles and be worked &#111;n by the worms and insects in the sand. These c&#111;nsume the detritus cycling it into smaller and smaller particles that bacteria can work &#111;n. Without the larger particles the detritus swirls around &#111;n top of the fine sand providing a layer of nutrient rich water for cyanobacteria to grow in.</P><P>Mark</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=805&amp;title=wet-dry#805</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Mark, Thanks for your post. These...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=801&amp;title=wet-dry#801</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=59">jenjardu</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January&nbsp;06&nbsp;2003 at 11:41am<br /><br /><P>Mark,</P><P>Thanks for your post.&nbsp; These threds are really helping me learn alot and also are getting me even more excited to keep learning about our hobby.&nbsp; I have two questi&#111;ns.</P><P>Is the use of a skimmer and sump a must with this &#102;orm of filtrati&#111;n?</P><P>I currently have a 30 gal&#111;n reef tank w/no skimmer and no sump about 15 lbs of live rock about 1" of live sand.&nbsp; This is suplemented by a small mechanical filter the brand of which I'm not sure but I belive it cycles about 50g/hr.&nbsp; And &#111;ne powerhead.&nbsp; &#079;nly inhabitants are &#111;ne open brain, 3 xenias (&#111;ne col&#111;ny), several astrea snail and redlegged hermits.</P><P>Any suggesti&#111;ns?</P><P>And how dose crushed coal help hold off the cyanobacteria?</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 11:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=801&amp;title=wet-dry#801</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : As you might see from the length...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=776&amp;title=wet-dry#776</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=4">Mark Peterson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;31&nbsp;2002 at 7:19pm<br /><br /><P>As you might see from the length of my posts, filtrati&#111;n is my major interest in the hobby. a few years ago I went &#111;n a field trip with my daughters school class. The two places we visited were the sewage treatment plant and the water treatment plant. I was fascinated.</P><P>After the post earlier today I kept looking for answers. I apologize for not doing more research before writing that post. It appears that within the last ten years there has been some activity in the scientific community to try and define just what species of bacteria are working the nitrogen cycle and where they are doing it. This work has been d&#111;ne for the sewage and waste treatment industry and those c&#111;ncerned with water ecology and polluti&#111;n.</P><P>Here is what I have found out so far:</P><P>1. Amm&#111;nia is &#102;ormed almost immediately as the fish waste hits the oxygenated water.</P><P>2. Amm&#111;nia is changed to nitrite in both aerobic and anoxic z&#111;nes</P><P>3. Nitrite is changed to nitrate in aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic z&#111;nes</P><P>4. Nitrate is changed to nitrogen gas in both anoxic and anaerobic z&#111;nes</P><P>5. The bacteria that work &#111;n amm&#111;nia and nitrite are understood better than the bacteria that work &#111;n nitrate. Not enough studies have been d&#111;ne, but &#111;ne study c&#111;ncluded that at least ten types of bacteria work &#111;n nitrate in anaerobic z&#111;nes.</P><P>6. The studies do indicate that many species of bacteria other than the two that hobbyists talk about (nitrosom&#111;nas and nitrobacter) are working &#111;n the nitrogen cycle.</P><P>7. The nitrogen cycle has two parts:</P><P>Part 1 is known in scientific literature as the nitrificati&#111;n process:</P><P>waste <FONT face=Symbol>Þ</FONT> amm&#111;nia <FONT face=Symbol>Þ</FONT> nitrite <FONT face=Symbol>Þ</FONT> nitrate&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Mostly occuring in aerobic and anoxic z&#111;nes.</P><P>Part 2 is the process known as denitrificati&#111;n:</P><P>nitrate <FONT face=Symbol>Þ</FONT> nitrogen gas.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Most of it occurs in anoxic and anaerobic z&#111;nes. Observati&#111;n: The hobbyists understanding and use of denitrificati&#111;n is poorly lacking and almost n&#111;nexistent.</P><P>8. The bacteria doing this work are facultative, meaning they can live and reproduce under a wide range of nutrient c&#111;ncentrati&#111;ns. So when a fish dies or some excessive nutrient source is quickly added the bacteria can eat it up as so&#111;n as it appears. Observati&#111;n: This explains what many of us have seen, or haven’t seen as the case may be, when a large fish dies and disappears without a trace or without even a blip &#111;n the screen.</P><P>Note 1: If this is where denitrificati&#111;n occurs it appears that the shortcoming of the wet/dry system is clearly seen! Are the tanks that use a wet dry and have sand and rock as vulnerable? I d&#111;n’t think so and I will explain below in&nbsp;the hypothesis.</P><P>Note 2: This may point to a leading questi&#111;n of why nutrients/nitrates actually build up in the plenum rather than being denitrified! Especially plenums exposed to even dim light.</P><P>Hypothesis:</P><P>Here is a hypothesis based &#111;n the in&#102;ormati&#111;n above and my own observati&#111;ns:</P><P>Sand Beds especially Deep Sand Beds may be working better than anything we have ever seen because they offer a large anoxic and perhaps even a modest anaerobic layer. The times that I have broken a piece of live rock and found a black&nbsp;ring inside&nbsp;always caused me to w&#111;nder. I now believe that at about ¼ inch to 2 inches inside the rock, away from oxygen, the rock supports anoxic and anaerobic c&#111;nditi&#111;ns. So any&#111;ne with "filtrati&#111;n equipment" that has rock and or sand or both is biologically supplementing the shortcomings of that equipment.</P><P>Hobbyists with rock and with sand deep enough to c&#111;ntain an anaerobic z&#111;ne may be getting the best filtrati&#111;n we know of at this time. (If algae is growing somewhere in the system, then that’s not &#111;nly a b&#111;nus, but in my opini&#111;n an absolute necessity for the health of the aquarium.)</P><P>Please understand, I am not at all saying the filtrati&#111;n equipment isn’t worth it, but rather that deep sand beds and rock may be the best &#102;orm of filtrati&#111;n and perhaps more vital than any other filter.</P><P>Comments and arguments are requested.</P><P>Mark</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=776&amp;title=wet-dry#776</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Jody, Good questi&amp;#111;n. The...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=773&amp;title=wet-dry#773</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=4">Mark Peterson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;31&nbsp;2002 at 3:15pm<br /><br /><P>Jody,</P><P>Good questi&#111;n. The setup has to do, of course, with the use of regular CaribSea type sand(1-4mm) versus Oolitic sand(0.1- 0.3mm) and how the minimum sand bed depth needed for proper bacterial growth depends &#111;n the grain size of the substrate used. My understanding of bacterial growth c&#111;nditi&#111;ns is that the species that process amm&#111;nia and nitrite need oxygen but that nitrate processing bacteria grow in low oxygen (anoxic) and no oxygen (anaerobic) envir&#111;nments.</P><P>You have heard that we must stay away from anaerobic c&#111;nditi&#111;ns. Actually, I believe that a little anaerobic c&#111;nditi&#111;n is not a problem and in order to get sufficient growth of nitrate processing bacteria some anaerobic c&#111;nditi&#111;ns must exist, especially around the bottom of rocks in the sand.</P><P>I &#111;nce disturbed a large anaerobic layer that I had created unawares in a special freshwater planted tank. The plants grew like crazy and the fish flourished and bred, but the &#111;ne remaining fish that I had not found before beginning to tear down the tank died from Hydrogen Sulfide (HS) gas in less time than it took for me to smell the rotten egg odor. ( I understand that HS is undetectable by smell when it’s c&#111;ncentrati&#111;n is high enough to kill. That might be because people exposed to it died and were unable to comment &#111;n the smell!…. no actually, it’s because it overpowers the olfactory nerves before killing you!) Lower c&#111;ncentrati&#111;ns of HS stink but cannot kill.</P><P>Just d&#111;n’t stir the sand all at &#111;nce and there should be no problem. I actually recommend leaving the sand completely al&#111;ne. (Sorry if this goes against your understanding but in the envir&#111;nment the ground &#111;nly gets disturbed a little when a major storm goes through or an animal goes through rooting for food.) The benthic organisms turn over the sand plenty according to R&#111;n Shimek. He actually has a lot to say about it &#111;n <a target="_blank" href= "http://www.rshimek.com/"> color=#0000ffwww.rshimek.com</A> I recently found reference to a worm that lives in the anaerobic layer of marine mud hosting symbiotic sulfur fixing bacteria!</P><P>Though I work with plenty of Ph.D. Microbiologists doing bacterial fermentati&#111;n, I am not of that training, but have found a minimum level of sand that seems to handle the needs of these organisms. When the sand is finer the diffusi&#111;n of gases and nutrients is more restricted. If the minimum depth of the regular arag&#111;nite, the larger particle stuff has been found to be 3-4 inches, then the total depth of the substrate using finer sand can be reduced because the anoxic layer occurs closer to the surface and is more c&#111;ncentrated. It seems that an inch of Oolitic and 1 to 1.5 inches of CaribSea Special Grade Reef Sand (1-4 mm) provide the right amount of bacterial bed. If you like, a thin layer of rubble or crushed coral can also be added, but that isn't necessary and some people d&#111;n't like the larger "puca sand" type stuff.</P><P>C&#111;nsider that bacteria live &#111;n the surfaces of everything. If &#111;ne piece of 2mm arag&#111;nite has say about 3 square mm of surface area then the amount of Oolitic that can fit in the same space will have 9 or more square mm. I have read the figures and I am being c&#111;nservative because I can't remember the actual figures. (It might be &#111;n R&#111;n’s website.) That's a lot more area for bacteria to inhabit and a lot more nitrates processed.</P><P>The reas&#111;n for the courser arag&#111;nite &#111;n top comes from my own experience with using &#111;nly Oolitic. The beautiful effect of the nice white sandy beach was offset by an algae problem. Detritus had no where to go and swirled around &#111;n top of the sand. It &#101;ventually created a red cyanobacteria bloom across the entire sandy surface.</P><P>Also c&#111;nsider that algae c&#111;nsume amm&#111;nia and nitrates. If you have sufficient algae in the main tank or in the sump, the whole tank is healthier and happier. I have recently spoken with some&#111;ne that told me all the tanks she saw in H&#111;ng K&#111;ng had a floor of algae, most likely caulerpa from her de&#115;cripti&#111;n. She liked watching the fish swim around in the caulerpa. Does any&#111;ne want to try a tank with a floor of caulerpa? Adam &#111;nce had a tank that was the closest I have ever seen to this kind of c&#111;ncept. Adam and I both love algae!</P><P>Mark</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=773&amp;title=wet-dry#773</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Mark, Just &amp;#111;ne questi&amp;#111;n!...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=770&amp;title=wet-dry#770</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=54">JodyR</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;30&nbsp;2002 at 7:34pm<br /><br /><P><!-- Z&#111;neLabs Popup Blocking Inserti&#111;n -->Mark,</P><P>Just &#111;ne questi&#111;n! In your experiences what is the make-up of what you refer to as a&nbsp; "A substrate, if set up properly, handles all three stages from Amm&#111;nia to Nitrogen gas."</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Jody<&#083;CRIPT language=java&#115;cript>postamble();</&#083;CRIPT></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=770&amp;title=wet-dry#770</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Thanks for every&amp;#111;nes feedback....]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=755&amp;title=wet-dry#755</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=63">ewaldsreef</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;27&nbsp;2002 at 6:54pm<br /><br />Thanks for every&#111;nes feedback. Mark, I will be at the next meeting it sounds like its going to be a good &#111;ne. I hope to learn allot. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=755&amp;title=wet-dry#755</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Torghn has a good understanding...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=749&amp;title=wet-dry#749</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=4">Mark Peterson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;27&nbsp;2002 at 5:34am<br /><br /><P>Torghn has a good understanding of the basics. Jake is an old pro.</P><P>A comment made about the producti&#111;n of excess nitrates is an interesting &#111;ne. As good as wet dry equipment is for many people, the big problem is that the wet-dry or trickle filter does &#111;nly 2/3 of the job. Those (nasty) bioballs are home to the bacteria that c&#111;nvert amm&#111;nia to nitrite and nitrite to nitrate and that's good! But the bacteria that eat nitrate cannot live in an oxygen rich envir&#111;nment. The trickling water in a wet-dry is very rich in oxygen. (The reas&#111;n bioballs are "nasty" is that they accumulate detritus and then let go of it, sometimes all at &#111;nce, causing major problems in the aquarium.)</P><P>The nitrate molecule is most toxic to&nbsp;inverts&nbsp;but not so hard &#111;n fish. That's why fish &#111;nly tanks can do&nbsp;okay&nbsp;with wet-dry filtrati&#111;n, even with it's occasi&#111;nal crashes.</P><P>So… what to do with the nitrate molecules… The nitrate remains in the system until broken apart by low oxygen (anoxic but not anaerobic) bacteria. The resulting nitrogen gas is mostly absorbed into the water and is "gased off" at the surface. My understanding is that the oxygen part of the nitrate molecule is used by the bacteria.</P><P>Where&nbsp;can these bacteria grow?</P><P>Is there anything else that&nbsp;can handle this third stage of the process?</P><P>What if there were something that handled all three stages at &#111;nce?</P><P>It is my understanding that the most effective filtrati&#111;n; the filtrati&#111;n that handles all three stages of the Nitrogen Cycle; occurs in the substrate and rock. It's natures way! All the other stuff, i.e.; outside filters, skimmers, wet-dry systems, adsorpti&#111;n media(carb&#111;n, etc.), oz&#111;nizers,<BR>de-nitrifiers, ultraviolet (UV) sterilizers; always come up lacking, when compared to the biological activity of a good sand bed.</P><P>All of the current literature tells us about the complete bacterial activity, the "Nitrogen Cycle", which occurs in the sand bed and the rock. A substrate, if set up properly, handles all three stages from Amm&#111;nia to Nitrogen gas.</P><P>But you know what? The Nitrogen Cycle is &#111;nly half the story of the filtrati&#111;n activity that’s going &#111;n in that microscopic world of sand and rock. An hour of the next WMAS meeting will be devoted to a discussi&#111;n of filtrati&#111;n. I hope that the presenter makes biological filtrati&#111;n a major part of the discussi&#111;n. And I hope that you can attend.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Mark R. Peters&#111;n<BR>Founding Member and Treasurer, Wasatch Marine Aquarium Society<BR><a target="_blank" href= "http://www.utahreefs.com/"> color=#800080www.utahreefs.com</A><BR>Volunteer, The Living Planet Aquarium <a target="_blank" href= "http://www.thelivingplanet.com/"> color=#0000ffwww.thelivingplanet.com</A><BR>801-296-1563<BR><a target="_blank" href= "mailto:mrpslc@mstar2.net"> color=#0000ffmrpslc@mstar2.net</A><BR>Salt Lake City, Utah<BR></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 05:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=749&amp;title=wet-dry#749</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : what about a deep sand bed and...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=747&amp;title=wet-dry#747</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=63">ewaldsreef</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;26&nbsp;2002 at 4:51pm<br /><br />what about a deep sand bed and live rock in the main tank in additi&#111;n to a wet dry? Or is the wet dry still going to produce an excess of nitrates? another idea I had was to run a 30 gall&#111;n refuge&nbsp; off the sump of the wet dry filter . The refuge would share water from the sump and be independant from the main tank so the flow would be slower in the sump. The whole pi&#111;nt of writing this thread is I want to go with the best possible filtrati&#111;n for my 125 gall&#111;n. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2002 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=747&amp;title=wet-dry#747</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[wet dry : Torghn is partiallyright. It doesn&amp;#039;t...]]></title>
   <link>http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=745&amp;title=wet-dry#745</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Jake Pehrson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 169<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December&nbsp;26&nbsp;2002 at 11:07am<br /><br /><P>Torghn is partially&nbsp;right.&nbsp; It doesn't matter what type of filtrati&#111;n you use amm&#111;nia will be c&#111;nverted to nitrite and then into nitrates the same whether&nbsp;you use&nbsp;Live Rock, sand bed, or wet dry.&nbsp; The difference comes after the c&#111;nversi&#111;n to nitrate.&nbsp; Nitrate is remove when bacteria populates a low oxygen area (like a deep sand bed, or some places in live rock) and turn the Nitrate into Nitrogen.&nbsp; This low oxygen area is not present in a Wet/Dry.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=169&amp;PID=745&amp;title=wet-dry#745</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>