Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Chris
Guest
Joined: November 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 376
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Why Animals? Posted: September 03 2005 at 2:32pm |
I am wondering why we call corals animals? According to www.dictionary.com an animal is defined as.
- A multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.
- An animal organism other than a human, especially a mammal.
- A person who behaves in a bestial or brutish manner.
- A human considered with respect to his or her physical, as opposed to spiritual, nature.
- A person having a specified aptitude or set of interests: “that rarest of musical animals, an instrumentalist who is as comfortable on a podium with a stick as he is playing his instrument” (Lon Tuck).
Corals as far as I know do not have any form of locomotion especially SPS and LPS. Some soft corals can move by them selfs. Corals are also almost all photosynthetic. Corals also for the most part do not have a restricted growth or fixed body structure. This rules them out of the animal category completely.
Anemones are the closest to animals because they can move, have a restricted growth, and fixed structure. But they are still photosynthetic making them not animals.
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 2:37pm |
Corals are also almost all photosynthetic.
No coral that I know of is photosynthetic. The algae that lives inside their tissue is photosynthetic though... But, I agree, corals are a strange animal indeed.
|
|
 |
Chris
Guest
Joined: November 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 376
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 3:25pm |
If you take away the light they will die. They can not live without light. The algae that live inside of them is part of them. To say it it a symbolic relationship is just non since. Thats like saying that we have a symbolic relationship with are white blood cells. Without are white blood cells we would get sick and die.
So with that in mind they are photosynthetic.
Besides even if they are not photosynthetic they still have no form of locomotion, they keep growing, and they do not have any set shape.
We should call them plants because plants have no form of locomotion, they keep growing, they do not have any set shape, and they are photosynthetic.
|
 |
Adam Blundell
Presidency
Joined: June 24 2002
Location: Davis County
Status: Offline
Points: 18526
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 4:00pm |
Chris- some very good questions. Not many people actually ask these types of questions. 
Corals are not photosynthetic. Take away the light and lots of them live just fine. In the hobby we tend to focus on the photosynthetic corals.
They do have determinant growth, with a defined shape. The problem is you just aren't seeing it. Thing of an acropora head. It is made of hundreds (and thousands) of individual little coral polyps, each its own living animal. Looking at an acropora head is like looking at a field of snails, a ship hull covered in barnacles, a crowd of people at the delta center. They can live as a community but each is a seperate animal.
Trust me, a coral is most definately an animal. I'm sure you would agree that a jellyfish is an animal and that is basically a swimming coral.
Adam
|
Come to a meeting, they’re fun!
|
 |
Chris
Guest
Joined: November 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 376
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 4:03pm |
Why are they animals?
Because when they spawn the eggs and sperm create a zygote (fertilized egg). Zygotes develop into a oval planula larval that hatches and swims. Planula larval is defiantly an animal. It can swim (locomotion), has restricted growth (does not grow much if any), has fixed body shape, and is non photosynthetic. Planula larval will settle down on a solid surface and then metamorphose into a polyp. Once one polyp is established it will continue to grow (LPS, softies) or asexually reproduce into more polyps (SPS).
Something I was not thinking about before was that a coral is a colony of polyps. Polyps are restricted to growth, and do have a fixed shape. The colony itself is not restricted in size or shape.
In summery corals are only animals because of how they start out in life. otherwise they would not be an animal.
Please correct me if I am wrong about this in any way.
|
 |
Adam Blundell
Presidency
Joined: June 24 2002
Location: Davis County
Status: Offline
Points: 18526
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 4:40pm |
Chris- you are almost right on the money here.
But there is one more thing, that really is the true answer in terms of symantics. Why are they animals? Because they evolved from animal ancestors. That really is it. An animal cell is going to give birth to another animal cell, and it won't ever turn into a plant. Animal cells (including corals) have mitochondria and plants don't. Plants have firm cell walls, animal cells are like a bag of jello with soft flexible membranes.
Hard to explain but since I absolutely love this type of conversation I'm trying.
Adam
|
Come to a meeting, they’re fun!
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 5:22pm |
To say it it a symbolic relationship is just non since.
Why is it nonsense? Is that corn field across the street part of you? Without photosynthesis you would most certainly not exist. Just 'cause some corals keep their farms inside their bodies doesn't mean they're plants.
In summery corals are only animals because of how they start out in life. otherwise they would not be an animal.
No.
A multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.
They are in the kingdom Animalia. Some exhibit locomotion, some don't. They are all nonphotosynthetic, they respond to stimuli, they show restricted growth and have a fixed body structure. Maybe that definition isn't right 
|
|
 |
deedo
Guest
Joined: March 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 131
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 5:56pm |
Words!
We have to be carefull not to be blinded by symantics and dated lexical definitions. IMO we should try to craft our language around our world, not the other way around
Kingdoms of nature that we learned about in little school do not exist. Nature just isn't aranged in a hirearchy.
Like Adam said, the way to define animals (or any critter/group of critters) that is most reflective of our reality is common ancestry. Here's how animals relate to other critters.
http://tolweb.org/tree?group=Eukaryotes
And here's how animals are related to each other:
http://tolweb.org/tree?group=Animals&contgroup=Eukaryote s
This a cool website that is continously updated as new phylogenetic info is created.
btw, plants have mitochondria too.
Edited by deedo
|
"Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins the movie by telling you how it ends. Well, I say there are some things we don't want to know. Important things!" - Ned Flanders
|
 |
bugzme
Guest
Joined: May 22 2004
Location: West Jordan
Status: Offline
Points: 4815
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 5:57pm |
I really like this thread! I'm learning alot!
|
Jeff
125 tank
50 gallon sump
T-5 lighting
Rum drinker, Carbon User
I KNOW ROCKS THAT ARE YOUNGER THEN ME!! I AM A Realist! I write what I think!!
|
 |
dnellans
Guest
Joined: October 29 2003
Location: Uzbekistan
Status: Offline
Points: 842
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 6:12pm |
i have to call bs on adam.... plants DEFINITELY have mitocondria and not all plant cells have firm cell walls either!
There are also plants that don't have clorophyl, so you can't use to
determine what is a plant or not. However i do not know if there
is something called an animal that actually has chloroplasts as part of
its own cell dna. can anyone name one?
A side note there are mollusks that eat plants and then can utilize the
plant cloroplasts WITHIN their cell walls, not just symbiotically like
corals. now THAT is a hard call to make one where the
animal/plant line is...
|
 |
deedo
Guest
Joined: March 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 131
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 6:37pm |
No I don't think there are any animals with chloroplast genes on their genomes. The chloroplasts housed by those mollusks cannot proliferate because, while the chloroplast has many of the genes it needs to build more chloroplasts, many more required genes are on the host genome. So... it is symbiosis.
|
"Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins the movie by telling you how it ends. Well, I say there are some things we don't want to know. Important things!" - Ned Flanders
|
 |
Adam Haycock
Guest
Joined: August 23 2003
Location: Fiji
Status: Offline
Points: 2647
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 6:46pm |
dnellans wrote:
However i do not know if there is something called an animal that actually has chloroplasts as part of its own cell dna. can anyone name one?
|
Maybe not yet, but there will be... Evolution is too slow so humans will speed the process up a little ;)
|
|
 |
Adam Haycock
Guest
Joined: August 23 2003
Location: Fiji
Status: Offline
Points: 2647
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 6:48pm |
Wow, deedo.. Excellent posts
|
|
 |
Chris
Guest
Joined: November 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 376
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 8:21pm |
So the algae inside the coral does not have the same DNA as the coral does. This means it is a symbolic relationship.
So how does the coral get the algae when it changes from the Planula larval to the polyp?
Am glad that there is so many smart people on this board to help out on a subject like this. I am learning so much from this post.
|
 |
deedo
Guest
Joined: March 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 131
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 8:35pm |
|
"Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins the movie by telling you how it ends. Well, I say there are some things we don't want to know. Important things!" - Ned Flanders
|
 |
improdigal
Guest
Joined: May 02 2004
Location: Sugarhouse, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 1151
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 9:42pm |
The non-fishy People come over all the time and see my tank and ask "are Corals Plants or Animals?" and I answer, "both and neither", they are coral.
My understanding was that Corals were a class of their own because they were both Photosynthetic and they eat (and sometimes move), making them a class separate from either category.
To be honest, I can't remember where I heard this as a young child, but I always grew up believing their was 3 kinds of (multi-celled) life on the planet: Animal, Plant, and Coral.
|
Patrick
|
 |
Adam Haycock
Guest
Joined: August 23 2003
Location: Fiji
Status: Offline
Points: 2647
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 10:10pm |
Classification of Acropora sp.
Kingdom - Animalia (includes all animals)
Phylum - Cnidaria (includes all cnidarians - ie jelly fish, anemones, corals, hydras etc..)
Class - Anthozoa (includes all corals and anemones)
Order - Scleractinia (includes all stony corals)
Family - Acroporidae
Genus - Acropora
Species (ie palmata)
|
|
 |
Chris
Guest
Joined: November 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 376
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 10:37pm |
Deedo where do you get your info? How do you search for stuff like that? Also isn't your avatar a picture of a coral larval?
|
 |
davehuish
Guest
Joined: July 16 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 14
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 11:14pm |
Coral are animals that are able to "catch" zooxanthellae. These
zooxanthellae are dinoflagellates of the genus symbiodinium.
These were originally believed to be animals hence the name
"zoo"-xanthellae. These symbionts are captured the same way other
food sources are except the symbiodinium is not digested but stored
within the coral tissue where they grow and their metabolic waste feeds
the corals. Some corals such as Dendronepthya do not contain
zooxanthellae in their tissue but consume them directly. In
response to corals not moving I think that is important to mention
pulsing xenia and the ability of fungia to move by hydration and
pivoting. For people who think that plants don't move check out
the BBC produced "Secret lives of plants". Also their is much
debate whether or not dinoflagellates are animals or algae. Algae
on the other hand is in the Protista kingdom so technically
zooxanthallae is neither plant or animal but algae. Truth be told
algae is just as fascinating as corals plus they taste alot better
Edited by davehuish
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: September 03 2005 at 11:37pm |
There is talk of dinoflagellates being in a kingdom of their own. Right now I think they are Protista...
|
|
 |