| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Ca Reactor w/ or w/o Kalk Posted: December 30 2003 at 3:24pm |
My reactor will be in next week and I'm really wanting to get away from dripping kalk. I decided to go with a GEO reactor which is a single stage unit so I'm not sure how it is going to effect my PH. Other than PH is there any benefit to dripping kalk with the reactor? Is anyone running a single stage reactor w/o kalk?
Also, do calcium reactors also provide magnesium? or is mag something I still need to keep an eye on?
Any thoughts would be appreciated,
Edited by Travis
|
 |
Marcus
Guest
Joined: August 28 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1398
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2003 at 4:56pm |
|
Reactors do not provide Mg. I would keep your Mg around 3x your Ca level. Kalk raises your Ca too. There is another good article in this magazine about Ca. I'll give an overview of that one too when I get done with the MH lights.
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2003 at 7:26pm |
Calcium reactors do indeed supply magnesium. Think about where all your magnesium is going? Coralline and sps/lps growth right? What's in your calcium reactor? Ground up coral. So a calcium reactor will actually provide magnesium in the same proportion as your sps in your tank are consuming it (because everything in the reactor dissolves). But, you'll never see your magnesium climb from the use of a reactor as coral is only like 1% magnesium. But if your magnesium depletion is due mainly to SPS growth, it should maintain it ok.
BTW, reactors also supply strontium and if a bad substrate is used can also add phosphate.
Travis, I think pH is the only reason to dose kalk in tandam with a calcium reactor.
Edited by jfinch
|
|
|
 |
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2003 at 7:45pm |
Thanks for the input!! I'm going to start out with just the reactor and see what happens. If the PH does in fact drop then I will start using kalk again.
I'm getting ARM media which I have heard good reports of but I'll watch for phosphates just in case.
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2003 at 7:56pm |
|
I've never used a calcium reactor, but my guess is that any media sold by a "big" marine company (caribsea in your case, right?) for use in a reactor will be low in phosphates, so you have nothing to worry about. I'd just avoid any fly by night supplier or home grown...
|
|
|
 |
Aquarium Creations
Pet Store
Joined: August 20 2003
Location: DRAPER
Status: Offline
Points: 3234
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2003 at 7:58pm |
I use just good old crush coral much cheaper and is the same as ARM but cost alot less
Edited by FIRE SHRIMP
|
Aquarium Maintenance,Consulting,Custom Built Glass Aquariums Rimless/Euro,24Hr Emergency Service 8015485201 Www.UtahAquariumDoctors.com [email protected]
|
 |
Marcus
Guest
Joined: August 28 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1398
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 30 2003 at 8:07pm |
|
Jon, I never thought about the Mg from a reactor. Thanks!
|
 |
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 31 2003 at 9:09am |
FIRE SHRIMP wrote:
I use just good old crush coral much cheaper and is the same as ARM but cost alot less |
Where do you keep the PH of the reactor using cc? I've read that 6.5-6.7 is a good PH but that some media requires a even lower PH to dissolve.
|
 |
Marcus
Guest
Joined: August 28 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1398
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 31 2003 at 2:10pm |
|
Travis, read my thread about Calcium help. It may help you a little.
|
 |
Mark Peterson
Paid Member
Joined: June 19 2002
Location: Murray
Status: Offline
Points: 21436
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 01 2004 at 8:58am |
|
Also read the Sea Star Online, April 2001 article about Ca Reactors by a very knowledgable ex WMAS member, Jim Perry.
|
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244 Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member
|
 |
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 06 2004 at 9:48am |
Thanks guys, the both articles are very informative .
Well it arrived today bad thing is I'm in Colorado so I can't play with it until this weekend...
|
 |
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2004 at 7:01am |
Here it is

|
 |
Marcus
Guest
Joined: August 28 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1398
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2004 at 8:45am |
|
Travis, how much was that, if you don't mind me asking?
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2004 at 8:49am |
|
That looks like a nice set-up! Keep us up to date on how you like it (you never know, I may need a design to "look at for inspiration" down the road).
|
|
|
 |
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2004 at 9:02am |
Marcus, every thing you see in the picture cost 705.13 delivered. About the only thing missing is some calibration liquid for the PH controller and a second brass check valve. The brass check valve is optional but to me it's just extra protection.
Thanks Jon, I'll keep everyone posted on its performance. I think a dual chamber would have been nice but I've heard a lot of good reports from this unit.
|
 |
Travis
Guest
Joined: September 23 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 621
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2004 at 9:50am |
|
Marcus, FYI, the GEO recommendation as a starting point is 35ml per minute and 30 BPM. They also recommend not to adjust up over 10 BPM at a time: and wait 12 to 24 hours between adjustments. It also says that the alk of the effluent will be around 2-3 times that of the tank. Just some things I thought may help.
|
 |
Marcus
Guest
Joined: August 28 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1398
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2004 at 12:00pm |
|
Cool - I got the reactor tuned in perfect on the other tank that I helping with. The pH stays between 8.1-8.35.
|
 |