Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: another wet dry ? Posted: April 04 2003 at 10:46pm |
Ok so I pretty much understand the whole wet dry thing about the excess nitrates. My question is the reason they produce so many nitrates only because the bio balls trap excess debris that cant be removed so they then break down in the filter?
I have heard that they are to efficent at breaking down amonia and nitrite. well isnt ammonia and nitrite more harmful then nitrate?
also you only have x amount of ammonia in the tank anyway correct? So it shouldnt matter how efficent the filter is unless the filter acually creats the ammonia. I hope someone can see my confusion and help me to understand this a little bit better. The meeting got me thinking about this. I know I had a previous post about wet dry but my questions are a little differant in this post.
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
Sarnack
Guest
Joined: August 20 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 324
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 04 2003 at 11:27pm |
Here is my best shot at clearing this up for you:
Wet-drys are just efficient at converting ammonia and nitrite to nitrate, and that is where they stop they do nothing to nitrate. Because to break down Nitrate you need an area with low oxygen, and wet-drys are made to have high oxygen levels so the bacteria can do their job of converting waste to nitrate.
Wet-drys do not "make" nitrates, they only convert waste into nitrate.
There is nothing wrong with wet-dry filters they are very good at what they do! And yes Nitrate is less toxic than ammonia and nitrite that is why in a fish only system wet-drys are great cause you are not as concerned with Nitrate building up in the aquarium. In a reef tank environment though you want to keep the nitrates low so you would have to use some method along with the wet-dry to keep the nitrates from accumulating.
This help any?
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 05 2003 at 9:36am |
Sarnack, Thank you for your input . What you said makes sense however it doesnt explain why people hate wet drys so much.
I am thinking of running a wet dry along with a dsb in the main tank and a refuguim. I would think that would be a good filtration system but I bet allot of people would tell me to not use the wet dry part of it. I am trying to figure out why. I may just have to see for myself through actual experance.
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
Sarnack
Guest
Joined: August 20 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 324
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 05 2003 at 11:53am |
The problem with filtration is everyone thinks they use the best method and everyone else is wrong. Maybe wet-drys got a bad name when other methods came in to use like Berlin and Jaubert and people switched cause it was the newest greatest thing?
I think that a wet-dry with dsb and refugium would be a great filtration set-up. The wet-dry will handle the ammonia and nitrite very well and then the algae in the 'fuge will consume the nitrate and the bacteria in the dsb will break down the nitrate back down to nitrogen and oxygen gas.
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 05 2003 at 1:29pm |
Thanks for your help Sarnack. I am going to just try it and see what happens. If nothing else I am sure I will learn from it. 
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
Adam Blundell
Presidency
Joined: June 24 2002
Location: Davis County
Status: Offline
Points: 18526
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 05 2003 at 2:50pm |
I too think this is a good filtration system. You can never have too much filtration. If it works for you stick with it, if not change. And congrats on taking the approach to go for it and not be turned away by others' opinions.
Adam
|
Come to a meeting, they’re fun!
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 07 2003 at 6:35am |
I also posted this same question on reef central and got some more feedback if anyone is interested.
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=1199964#post1199964
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
administrator
Admin Group
Joined: January 25 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 0
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 08 2003 at 9:25am |
I read the posts on reef central. It seems to me that there are some stupid people out there, expressing their opinions when they have no real info to back up their stance. Don't believe everything you hear.
I agree with Adam.
My $.02
Jake Pehrson
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 08 2003 at 10:31am |
If I keep tabs on my nitrate levels while running the wet dry I should be able to figure out for myself if it creats a problem or not. Also I would a think there would be a differance running a large wet dry as compared to a smaller one. If I am using a smaller amount of wet dry filtration and a larger amount of "natural" ie live rock then I dont think I would have the same problem with excessive nitrates. Time for some actual research on my part. That way I can say I tryed it myself and it did or did not work well.
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
peiji
Guest
Joined: October 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2142
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 08 2003 at 11:05am |
Just thought I would chime in here. I've been running a Bio-wheel HOB filter with a DSB for a year now in my reef tank. I thought I had a pretty good thing going. Just a few days ago, I was talking to a LFS owner and he told me the same thing about not running the bio-wheel because there would be a buildup of Nitrates. I took his word for it and removed the bio-wheels. Now though, I'm wondering if I should have stuck with what I had. I tested my tank and didn't have any Nitrates. I keep thinking I'm doing the test wrong or something but I don't know how I could be. I'm going to let it run for a while more and see if I can get by without the bio wheels and if it seems to improve things overall. I'm also wondering about this issue again because I'm starting up a little 6 g. Eclipse Nano tank with a built-in bio-wheel filter. Will a DSB and live rock be enough to filter this liitle tank? Or, should I continue to use the bio-wheel, or do I need something else altogether? My dilemma.
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 08 2003 at 7:23pm |
peiji I had an eclipse 3 gallon for about 4 months with the bio wheel setup it came with. I had no problems with the tank. I tore it down for a slightly larger setup. I would personaly leave the bio wheel. With such a small tank you have to watch it close anyway.
Did you notice a nitrate change before and after you removed the bio wheel?
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
Adam Blundell
Presidency
Joined: June 24 2002
Location: Davis County
Status: Offline
Points: 18526
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 08 2003 at 8:25pm |
I too (like Jake) read the posts on reefcentral. What a bunch of idiots! You are correct Jake.
The problem isn't their view points, it isn't their understanding (or lack of understanding) that is the problem. The problem is they don't admit they don't know anything and they speak adamantly about their views. Jake and I have discussed this problem in the past and pistonfister has found a great example
while shaking my head in disbelief.....
Adam
|
Come to a meeting, they’re fun!
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 08 2003 at 8:48pm |
I think you know my opinion of wet/drys (see that other thread).
Great for fish only tank, not for reefs. Again this just my opinion, based on a couple experiences. My first reef was set up with "mechanical" filtration (a filter mat, sitting on top of the wet/dry drip plate) along with live rock, sand and skimmer. I tried to be consistent and change the pad every week, but didn't always do it. It ran like this for about 8 months with nitrates around 5 - 10 ppm. After doing my own reading and talking to others, I decided to remove the filter mat. Bingo, my nitrates dropped to undetectable and my slight hair algea problem went away with it. About a year later a friend of mine did essentially the same thing with the same results. You might say I just didn't know how to operate my filtration system...could be, but that tank went on to run for years without any real problems.
I think the filter pad traps "junk" and allows it to decompose before the skimmer has a chance to remove it and was a good place for nitrifying bacteria to grow.
After the first month or two (after it's cycled) you should never detect any nitrite or ammonia in your tank with or without bioballs/wheels. I think I know what Jake was getting at with his 10=10=10, it's a simple nitrogen balance. The only thing a little misleading (IMO) is that not all ammonia (or nitrogen) in the aquarium has to go to nitrate before it's exported by algae, corals or denitrifiying bacteria. A proper functioning skimmer will remove the biowaste before it ever even has a chance to decompose to ammonia. And algae will uptake ammonia easier then nitrate. So IMO, in a reef tank a lot (or some?) of the nitrogen (organic and ammonia) are exported before they even get started in the nitrogen cycle. This in effect reduces the required population of nitrification bacteria needed in the aquarium. The ammonia that is not incorporated into algea then starts its path on the nitrogen cycle, being oxidized to nitrite then nitrate. I think the denitrification/nitrification bacteria need to be in close proximity to each other for denitrification to occur at any significant rate. Therefore I think it's best for the nitrification to occur on the outer surface of the liverock (or sand) where there's potential for denitrification to occur deeper in the rock (or sand). If the nitrification occurs physically away from an anerobic spot, the H+ available for denitrification is diluted or consumed in the CO3-HCO3-CO2 balance.
I, personally, would never begin a reef using a wet/dry. If I ran into ammonia/nitrite problems down the road, I might consider it or more macro algae. Having said all this, I have two neighbors with reefs operated with biowheels and neither one of them have high nitrates or hair algea so there's obviously more then one way to skin a cat (and I would contend that the biowheel's are not doing much anyway...but not proven :) ). So if you have a wet/dry go ahead and use it, if you don't like the results you can always stop using it. If you don't already have one, and money's tight, IMO you're better served spending more on a skimmer or refugium.
WOW that's long... if you've read this far, you're a real reef freak! Just my thoughts...
|
|
 |
Jake Pehrson
Admin Group
Joined: June 13 2002
Location: Murray, UT
Status: Offline
Points: 4279
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 09 2003 at 2:49pm |
I agree with Jon to a point. The difference between Jon's argument and the argument people posted on Reef Central is Jon's argument has some intelligence to it. The Reef Central people don't use any logic in backing up what they are saying.
It is true that if the “Excess Nutrients” are removed before they are “filtered” they will not increase Ammonia, Nitrite or Nitrates in your tank. I hope I made this point in my presentation (maybe not well enough). Wet/Dry filters are probably not the best choice for a reef tank, but can, have and are being used successfully on many reef tanks.
|
|
 |
ewaldsreef
Guest
Joined: December 07 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3752
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 09 2003 at 9:14pm |
Wow lots of input. Thats good I am learning.
What jfincht says in the qote below makes allot of sense. It is basically what that other guy said on reef central. I think you guys are being a little hard on the reefcentral people. You are right I shouldnt belive everthing I read however they are just trying to help.
"I think the denitrification/nitrification bacteria need to be in close proximity to each other for denitrification to occur at any significant rate. Therefore I think it's best for the nitrification to occur on the outer surface of the liverock (or sand) where there's potential for denitrification to occur deeper in the rock (or sand). If the nitrification occurs physically away from an anerobic spot, the H+ available for denitrification is diluted or consumed in the CO3-HCO3-CO2 balance"
The thing about the skimmer also makes sense however most people dont run them 24/7. But thats a differant topic. I am not going to have the live rock to properly fill my tank for a while so I wanted to go with a substitute for it. That would be the wet dry that I already have. Also jfincht You said that you removed the filter pad from the wet dry. Did you remove the whole wet dry or just pad?
Let me shoot out one more idea. What if you had a wet dry that flowed right into a dsb? You could build and addition onto the wet dry. Also you can change the amount of bio balls in the wet dry to slow the conversion of amiona.
|
Contact me for professional aquarium maintenance and localy grown coral frags. [URL=http://www.aquatitranquility.com][/URL]
|
 |
jfinch
Guest
Joined: March 06 2003
Location: Pleasant Grove
Status: Offline
Points: 7067
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 10 2003 at 10:54pm |
You could have an interesting "experiment" here. Get your DSB seeded with sand from the next meeting, use the wet dry and hold out on live rock til funds improve. Keep an eye on nitrates and keep us informed (it might answer some of my questions regarding deep sand beds).
To answer your qestions: I only removed the filter pad, I had removed the balls from the begining. My friend's experience was with removing the bioballs from his wet/dry. I kept the wet/dry as a sump. My problems could have been been due to not changing the pad often enough(???). And I'd say, of the people who run skimmers, more run them 24/7 then not.
I guess a dsb in the sump is a good move, I'd also throw in some lights and algea to sweeten the deal. (opinion follows) I don't think it's a mater of how fast ammonia is formed, it's not kinetics that matter in biofiltration it's capacity. It's the total surface area available for bacteria to colonize. Every square inch of area is eventially colonized by bacteria. In my ideal reef, the majority of that surface area would be live rock and sand, not the glass sides of the tank or the bio-balls in the wet/dry or the sand in a fluidized bed... ymmv.
|
|
 |