Print Page | Close Window

LBTR / Utah Oolitic Sand:Good or Bad

Printed From: Utah Reefs
Category: Main
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: Posts that don't fit in any of the other categories.
URL: http://www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8936
Printed Date: February 18 2026 at 11:17pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: LBTR / Utah Oolitic Sand:Good or Bad
Posted By: coche
Subject: LBTR / Utah Oolitic Sand:Good or Bad
Date Posted: November 05 2005 at 10:30pm

I have seen the excitement from many people on this board annd from members about the usage on the LBTR and the Oolitic sand but I want to here first hand from you all what your thoughts are about using this stuff. What success and/or troubles you have seen with it!  The reason I am wondering is because of some opinions expressed by workers from various LFS. They have told me, and other people that I know not use any of it because it could be contaminated or contain ash. What do you all think?

Thanks

Justin

 



-------------
Justin Carr-Spanish Fork
60G cube LED



Replies:
Posted By: Tofunk
Date Posted: November 05 2005 at 10:57pm

    Ive had oolitic sand I collected in my tank for 2 years now with no problems,

but the friend I collected the sand with didnt clean his as well as I did and he had problems

I love it though,it looks great in a reef tank!



-------------
My Boxer Yogi. My Friend, My Buddy!!!


Posted By: flyboy62800
Date Posted: November 06 2005 at 4:51am

My tank is 50% LBTR.  You really have to know what you are looking for in order to tell the difference between it and the live rock I got from the LFS.  I really like it.

I haven't used the oolitic sand but I wished that I knew about it before I bought the the expensive live sand.

Greatest thing about LBTR and oolitic sand is that it is free, which means you can spend the savings on the fun stuff (coral!!) and you can get a nice selection of pieces to aquascape your tank with (the stuff breaks easily to make just about any shape).  

 



Posted By: Mark Peterson
Date Posted: November 06 2005 at 9:31am

I've been using it in my tanks and have set up just as many friends tanks with both. It's been at least four years now. There are literally hundreds of tanks in Utah with anywhere from a few pieces to 100%. In a good environment it looks like Ocean LR within a year. When prepared properly there are absolutely NO PROBLEMS with it. The preparation we must do to this sand and rock is no different than CaribSea does to their stuff behind the scenes before we see it in bags at the LFS.

And speaking of LFS, those owners and employees (except for me) have never used it so how can they be relied upon for accurate advice regarding it?

The sand must be screened (window screen) to remove sticks, rocks and bullet shells and rinsed in freshwater until the rinsewater turns from brown to light gray. The rock must be blasted clean with a high pressure wash like at the car wash when the handle is squeezed. (Use the Rinse setting).

If you want to see it dry unprepared and then how it looks after a year, undistinguishable from other LR feel free to call and come visit me. My phone number is below.



-------------
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:
www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244
Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member


Posted By: Bob Kripfgans
Date Posted: November 06 2005 at 10:01am
Mark said it all. I use 90% both sand and rock with great results. Mark was the pioneer on where and how to find and utilize this rescource by posting his findings on this message board. You cannot tell the difference today from purchased or found sand or rock. Actually I have found rock that in my eyes is better then what I have purchased. What I mean by that , it is very pourus and to me adds to the bio filtration in my tanks. Let me add, seed your beds and rock from fellow members or LFS for a great looking and fully functioning bio filter using oolitic sand and utah rock. If you do it as Mark said you will not have any problems. All my future tanks will be set up this way, and I have confidence it the method. We are blessed here in Utah to have a piece of the ocean thousands of years old landlocked in the middle of the U.S.A.     

-------------
WMAS is da place!
Save the Banggai's!
Tooele,Ut.


Posted By: sjlopez39
Date Posted: November 06 2005 at 6:36pm
I have had atleast 1/4 of the rock in my tank Utah aragonite for atleast 4 years.

When I re- set up my tank due to moving about 16 months ago, I deided to go with Utah oolitic sand. I placed about a 1/2 inch of live reef grade aragonite sand on top to seed the oolitic.

I am very pleased with the results. I also prepared the sand and rock the way Mark says to.

-------------
Keep your hands and arms inside the tank and enjoy the ride!

Steve


Posted By: Jody
Date Posted: November 06 2005 at 9:11pm

Hi Justin,

I use both the Utah rock and the oolitic sand in my 75 gal. setup. I have not had any problems and no (you heard it right), no hair algae or any other problems that I have heard other people talk about. In fact, the Utah rock has more corline (sp) algae on it now and looks better than the rest of the so-called "live rock" I payed big bucks for in the local reef stores!

I think the key is cleaning the rock well. I took the Utah rock to the car wash and blasted it 2 different times with just clean (not recylcled) water. The oolitic sand was screened before I washed it to get out the dirt clods, rocks, wood, etc. Then it was washed real well. When I added it to my tank I also put it some small gravel from the pet store as well as some live sand from several other tanks. No problems 1 year later!

My tank is filled with a variety of inverts, soft and hard coral, as well as a few fish. Everyone is happy and growing fast. No outbreakes of disease, diatoms, algae, high phosphate readings, or unexpected fish/coral/invert deaths either.

Certainally use caution in all you do, and it does not matter if it is advise from the local pet store or if you are trying something new on your own like using oolitic sand. However I have not had any problems with the Utah sand or rock.

Jody



-------------
75 gal Reef Tank

45 gal Sump



Posted By: KeoDog
Date Posted: November 07 2005 at 7:44am
I have 450 lbs of Utah rock in my tank (no live rock was used) along with half of my sand being Utah oolitic in my 300g.  No problems to report here.

-------------
Kevin Kunz (Sandy, UT)
300g reef

"A trade by which one gains and the other loses is a fraud."   Ayn Rand


Posted By: flashmc
Date Posted: November 07 2005 at 8:15am
All the rock in my 55G is LBTR, it has all turned a nice shade of purple in the last year. Corraline covered it much quicker than I recall the 'real' live rock in my other tank. My sand is 90% oolitic. I have had no problems that I can attribute to the use of either. When setting up my next tank I will definitely use both again.

Question: If LBTR can be contaminated, can't we say the same about other live rock. Can these LFS employees guarantee that live rock purchased from them be completely free from contaminates, or detrimental hitchhikers? I doubt it, considering the amount of waste that is pumped into our oceans.


-------------
mailto:[email protected]" rel="nofollow - Robert Gordon

Riverton,UT


Posted By: Dion Richins
Date Posted: November 07 2005 at 9:12pm

Originally posted by flashmc flashmc wrote:


Question: If LBTR can be contaminated, can't we say the same about other live rock. Can these LFS employees guarantee that live rock purchased from them be completely free from contaminates, or detrimental hitchhikers? I doubt it, considering the amount of waste that is pumped into our oceans.

It really annoy's me when I hear my LFS telling customers that useing either is a terrible idea. My 125 has 60lbs of Utah rock and a good 75lbs od Utah sand. Both of these I personally collected. I dont have any problems that I can contribute to the use of these items.

The nice thing about Utah rock other than its free is the fact that there are no mantis shrimp or rock crabs on it.



-------------
http://www.customaquariumfurniture.com" rel="nofollow - Bad "censored" Cabinets
Best quality in the valley! He is one sexy bald guy, even with out a finger!(MAC)


Posted By: Jody
Date Posted: November 08 2005 at 8:39am
Originally posted by Holdencraft 33 Holdencraft 33 wrote:

The nice thing about Utah rock other than its free is the fact that there are no mantis shrimp or rock crabs on it.

You said it!  Both times I have set up my tank I have had such problems with the "live rock". First time it was a mantis shrimp, the 2nd time it was rock crabs. By the way....Other than a few bacteria I think the only live things on the rock I bought at the store was the shrimp or the rock crabs!



-------------
75 gal Reef Tank

45 gal Sump



Posted By: Dion Richins
Date Posted: November 08 2005 at 2:43pm
Originally posted by Jody Jody wrote:

Other than a few bacteria I think the only live things on the rock I bought at the store was the shrimp or the rock crabs!

No doubt!!!



-------------
http://www.customaquariumfurniture.com" rel="nofollow - Bad "censored" Cabinets
Best quality in the valley! He is one sexy bald guy, even with out a finger!(MAC)


Posted By: Ghetto Man
Date Posted: November 08 2005 at 3:13pm
Although I don't have anything new to add, for the record I am one more
person who has used it with no problems. My tank has been up for a year
and a half with 100% Utah sand, and 90% Utah rock. My rock was covered in
coraline within 6-8 months, and looks much better than many tanks I've
seen with live rock. I'd recommend it to anyone.


Posted By: jfinch
Date Posted: November 08 2005 at 3:33pm

Am I the only person who prefers live rock?

Cost is the only reason I would use LBTR.



-------------
Jon

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6y_EzjI_ljbIwf2n5uNzTw" rel="nofollow - What I've been doing...



Posted By: Jared
Date Posted: November 09 2005 at 6:44am
Originally posted by jfinch jfinch wrote:

Am I the only person who prefers live rock?

Cost is the only reason I would use LBTR.



Now that my LBTR has been in my tank for a couple years I like it better than the Fiji live rock I've got.  The live rock was "better" for about a year.  Also, I've got many of the really early pieces that were collected. Most of the stuff I see now isn't any where near as good as the old stuff.  Has any one found a better collection site yet?


-------------
Jared Neilsen
Lehi, Utah


Posted By: coche
Date Posted: November 09 2005 at 10:42pm

I really appreciate all of the input from all of you! I guess it is a gamble to use it but it is free!!! I think what Robert(FlashMC) wrote is true they can say that the storwbought stuff is safe but how do we the consumer know that to be fact?

 I was actually reading on a website while doing some research on this subject that some comercial subtrates (aragonite) is dry mined somewhere outside the us and is crushed to specific size and the shipped to different companies to be distributed. I dont know how much of that is fact but how do they know that it isnt coming out of contaminated ground somewhere below a nuclear facility in new dehli or somewhere 



-------------
Justin Carr-Spanish Fork
60G cube LED


Posted By: Adam Blundell
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 8:54am
Originally posted by jfinch jfinch wrote:

Am I the only person who prefers live rock?

Cost is the only reason I would use LBTR.

I agree.

Adam



-------------
Come to a meeting, they�re fun!


Posted By: jfinch
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 9:16am

"Kicka pooka maka wah wahini are the words I long to hear"

Waka waka nooky likey waka waka nooky licka, would you like a lei?



-------------
Jon

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6y_EzjI_ljbIwf2n5uNzTw" rel="nofollow - What I've been doing...



Posted By: P.C Pond buildr
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 9:22am

Wow, I guess that nobody uses live rock anymore, I collected some LBTR almost 10 years ago only to throw it out because I could not find any info on it, Now everyone uses it. I THINK that live rock is better than LBTR, I mean from a simple point of view it was grown in the ocean how can it not be better for our "mini oceans"? than rock we get from the desert? if you cure it right and examine it before it goes in your tank you won't have a problem with it, I mean really if both were free what would you use?

Jon, where is the results from that chemical tests you ran on the sand I gave you? I remember that the utah oolitic had considerabley less calciums etc, in it. Not to say that oolitic is bad but is it the best?

This is my point of view....Would I use utah rock? Sure if I needed to stock a tank with more rock than I could afford in live rock...but I sure would put in some live rock to get all the stuff that has been growing on it for the past 10,000 years.  



-------------
WMAS resident fathead :)
2000 gallons of salt.
St George Ut


Posted By: Adam Blundell
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 9:31am

Jon- you're getting my heart pumping (and waka waka nuka nuka to you too).

PC- live rock is better, but when setting up a big tank the cost of lbtr really is appealing.  Sand analysis here (it was reprinted and reformated following the original publication)...
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/2/short - http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/2/short

Adam



-------------
Come to a meeting, they�re fun!


Posted By: P.C Pond buildr
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 9:54am
Originally posted by Adam Blundell Adam Blundell wrote:

Jon- you're getting my heart pumping (and waka waka nuka nuka to you too).

PC- live rock is better, but when setting up a big tank the cost of lbtr really is appealing.  Sand analysis here (it was reprinted and reformated following the original publication)...
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/2/short - http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/2/short

Adam

 

Ah yes, So it is closer than I remember. I agree about how the cost is a huge factor in setting up a new aquarium, Like I said in my last paragraph, I would use it if I had/needed to.

 

Well, I am off to go cherry picking in LA...See ya all on saturday..



-------------
WMAS resident fathead :)
2000 gallons of salt.
St George Ut


Posted By: Mark Peterson
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 12:45pm

I actually add a few pieces of uncured LR to my system several times per year. It adds diversity and often comes with macroalgae that is new and different. But I hate to spend money when it is unecessary. In time, LBTR becomes almost as valuable to me as uncured LR from the ocean.

Originally posted by coche coche wrote:

I guess it is a gamble to use it...
 

LBTR is NOT a gamble. It is made of a mineral called aragonite that was formed in Lake Bonneville, an ocean that existed here 10,000 years ago. LR from the present ocean is also aragonite. Aragonite is composed of Calcium Carbonate. Calcium Carbonate is the best thing to have in the reef aquarium. It releases Calcium and Alkalinity into the water. These two components are the two most important water parameters of a reef aquarium.

THERE IS NO RISK TO USING LBTR. If prepared properly, it starts out almost sterile, with no living thing on it, but life colonizes on to it quickly. This life comes from from the aquarium in which it is placed. All that is needed is just one "seed" piece of good LR from the ocean or another aquarium. Of course, the more "seed" the better the LBTR will colonize.

On the other hand, ocean collected LR can contain what we call "hitchhikers." Bad hitchhikers are Rock Crabs and Mantis Shrimp living in holes in the LR. Rock Crabs and Mantis Shrimp are not good for the typical reef aquarium. They prey on (kill & eat) snails, hermit crabs, fish and coral.

Hobbyists that have questions about LBTR would do well to see for themselves how LBTR becomes practically indistiguishable from ocean collected LR.

[quote=coche]...mined somewhere outside the us and is crushed to specific size and the shipped to different companies to be distributed. [/QUOTE]

CaribSea has the rights to mine it at their location in the Carribean. (somewhere outside the US.) They sort, size and clean it according to their customers requirements and then place it in bags that are distributed to the LFS. CaribSea delivers a quality product. I don't see any problem with that.



-------------
Reefkeeping Tips, & quick, easy setup tricks:
www.utahreefs.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9244
Pay it forward - become a paid WMAS member


Posted By: coche
Date Posted: November 10 2005 at 6:40pm

Well for what all of you have said it is plain to see that pretty much the end product is the same thing and with a little precaution taken the end result is the same accept for that the local stuff is a heack of alot cheaper. Therefore I see no reason not to take advantage of our natural resourses and use it. I think as Mark stated though it would be quite benificial to throw in some uncured pieces to ad a little life and diversity into the tank also!!

Thank you all for yout input it is amazing to me what a wealth of knowledge the people in this club have! You guys and gals rock!

Just a side note I hade the opportunity to meet Mark for the first time a couple of weeks ago at MSM. It was a pleasure to meet him and share in his passion for this hobby, his excitement and knowledge are definately countagious!! 

Thank You

Justin Carr 



-------------
Justin Carr-Spanish Fork
60G cube LED



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net